Question tabled on the Dangerous Dogs Act

I recently ventured into the vexed issue of the Dangerous Dogs Act, having been appalled by the cost of kennelling dogs seized in London under the terms of the Act  and the extraordinary time that it takes to process the dogs so seized to determine whether they should be destroyed.

My comments were intended to provoke a debate – and they certainly did that. I continue to think that it is ludicrous for the Metropolitan Police  to spend £10.6 million on kenneling dogs that have been seized. The processes for deciding what is to happen to the dogs concerned must be made much more speedy – in the interests of all concerned, especially the dogs that are being caged. I am also of the view that the Dangerous Dogs Act is a very poorly drafted piece of legislation – the emphasis should be on whether a particular animal is dangerous rather than whether it belongs to or resembles a specific breed. Those that breed and train dogs to attack and trade in such animals should also be the subject of much greater punishment than at present.

I have now tabled a question for oral answer in the House of Lords on Monday 21st June, as follows:

*Lord Harris of Haringey to ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they plan to amend or to improve the operation of the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991.

I will be interested to see what the Government has to say on the matter.

One thought on “Question tabled on the Dangerous Dogs Act”

  1. Those who breed attack dogs may well find it easier to command high prices if the animals look like pit bulls etc.

    While licencing is the way ahead the Dangerous Dogs Act has no doubt prevented many attacks occurring. It would be foolish to abolish it without a proper alternative.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *